To minimize academic misconduct, it is important that every instructor include a clear statement on the course syllabus that provides an operational definition of academic misconduct, and states the grading penalties a student may receive if they are found responsible for academic misconduct.  Do not assume that students will already know about definitions and consequences, even if you are teaching an upper-level course.

Beyond statements in the syllabus, creating a conversation at the beginning of the course allowing instructors, teaching assistants and students to discuss forms of academic misconduct – and especially those that might apply in your course – will reinforce with students what to expect and how to practice academic integrity.  You may also wish to engage in one or more of the activities listed below to give students a chance to negotiate what is, and isn’t, academic misconduct.

Sample Academic Conduct Statements for course syllabi

Academic Integrity

The University of Washington Student Conduct Code (WAC 478-121) defines prohibited academic and behavioral conduct and describes how the University holds students accountable. I expect that you will know and follow university policies on cheating and plagiarism.

Acts of academic misconduct include:

  • Cheating:
    • unauthorized assistance in person and/or online for assignments, quizzes, tests or exams
    • using another student’s work without permission and instructor authorization
    • allowing anyone to take a course, assignment or exam for you without instructor authorization
  • Falsification: intentional use of falsified data, information or records
  • Plagiarism: representing the work of others as your own without giving appropriate credit to the original author(s)
  • Unauthorized collaboration: working with each other on assignments without permission
  • Engaging in behavior prohibited by an instructor
  • Multiple submissions of the same work in different courses without instructor permission
  • Deliberately damaging or destroying student work to gain advantage
  • Unauthorized recording, and/or subsequent dissemination of instructional content
  • Using or uploading course assignments to online platforms like Course Hero, Chegg, etc.

If these definitions are not clear to you, please contact me or your TAs so that we can review them with you . It is important that you fully understand what is and is not permissible in this course.

Any suspected cases of academic misconduct will be handled according to university regulations, which include:

  1. Submission of the case material (description of the incident and supporting documents such as an exam, paper and any communications about the incident) to the College of the Environment Dean’s Office
  2. Suspension of the grade for the quiz, exam, homework, paper or other assignment in question
  3. An X grade for the class in the case of the academic misconduct procedure continuing past the end of the quarter
  4. A reduction, down to a zero, for the quiz, exam, homework, paper or other assignment in question should the academic misconduct hearing officer find you responsible

For more information, see the College of the Environment’s Academic Misconduct Policy and the Community Standards and Student Conduct website.

Honor Code for Exams, Quizzes and Assignments

I understand that I am bound by the Honor Code and the University of Washington Student Conduct Code and by the academic policies and procedures in this course when taking exams or quizzes, or completing assignments.

By entering my name and student number in the space below, I attest that I am in compliance with the conditions specified on this [exam, quiz, assignment] with regards to time and materials permitted. I further attest that I have not received any assistance from others during the [exam, quiz, assignment] period; and also that I have not given any assistance to other students.

Posting Course Materials Online

Do not share any course materials (lectures, lecture notes, recordings, assignments, quizzes, exams) posted to the class Canvas site. These materials are protected by U.S. copyright law and by University policy and may not be reproduced, distributed, displayed, posted or uploaded without written permission from the instructor. If you do so, you may be subject to academic misconduct proceedings under the UW Student Conduct Code.

Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom

Sample AI Syllabus Statements

Adapted from Teaching@UW guidance.

For instructors who allow AI use with some restrictions

In this course, students are permitted to use AI-based tools (such as ChatGPT) on some assignments. The instructions for each assignment will include information about whether and how you may use AI-based tools to complete the assignment. All sources, including AI tools, must be properly cited. Use of AI in ways that are inconsistent with the parameters above will be considered academic misconduct and subject to investigation.

Please note that AI results can be biased and inaccurate. It is your responsibility to ensure that the information you use from AI is accurate. Additionally, pay attention to the privacy of your data. Many AI tools will incorporate and use any content you share, so be careful not to unintentionally share copyrighted materials, original work, or personal information.

If you have any questions about citation or about what constitutes academic integrity in this course or at the University of Washington, please feel free to contact me to discuss your concerns.

For instructors who prohibit AI use

All work submitted for this course must be your own. Any use of generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, when working on assignments is forbidden. Use of generative AI will be considered academic misconduct and subject to investigation. If you have any questions about what constitutes academic integrity in this course or at the University of Washington, please feel free to contact me to discuss your concerns.

For instructors who allow AI use without restriction

Students in this course are encouraged to explore the use of AI-based tools (such as ChatGPT) when completing assignments. All sources, including AI tools, must be properly cited. Use of AI without proper citation will be considered academic misconduct and subject to investigation.

Please note that AI results can be biased and inaccurate. It is your responsibility to ensure that the information you use from AI is accurate. Additionally, pay attention to the privacy of your data. Many AI tools will incorporate and use any content you share, so be careful not to unintentionally share copyrighted materials, original work, or personal information.

If you have any questions about citation or about what constitutes academic integrity in this course or at the University of Washington, please feel free to contact me to discuss your concerns.

Detecting and Preventing AI Misuse

Please see the following Teaching Support Team “Teaching Memos” on how to “AI-proof” assignments and detecting unauthorized AI use:

Detecting plagiarism

Try online tools like SimCheck

The UW has a site license for SimCheck, a web-based system that scans student work against websites and other student work available on the internet and looks for similarity.  Each paper gets a similarity score.  Instructors can click on the paper to determine which components of each paper are similar to components in other works.

SimCheck is available through Canvas for instructors to set up plagiarism review on a per-assignment basis, and for students to submit assignments for review.

Tips for faculty for preventing academic misconduct

  • See the UW Office of Community and Standards and Student Conduct’s “Tips for preventing academic misconduct” for strategies and suggestions for preventing cheating on exams, homework assignments, and final project assignments.
  • If the course is writing intensive, spend approximately 20-30 minutes in class at the beginning of the quarter to discuss plagiarism and examples of what it is. Try the sample activities on understanding plagiarism below to make the plagiarism discussion interactive (students are more likely to recall such an activity than to recall a policy statement on the syllabus).
  • Encourage students to use SimCheck to check their scores and proactively contact the instructor with concerns about their score.
  • Design assignments that make it nearly impossible to plagiarize (e.g., use data that students collect in class).
  • For longer writing assignments, assign students to complete gathering, distillation, and synthesis exercises.
  • Use assignment and grading rubrics that are explicit, e.g. within the assignment, exposition is worth 15%, your argument is worth 30%, etc.
  • For longer research projects, check in with students regularly. Consider asking students to answer a short reflective assignment such as “How are you doing with finding information in the library?” or “How’s it going synthesizing and putting sources into your own words?”
  • Require at least one handwritten assignment early in the quarter that students complete in class so you have something clearly in their own voice as a style reference for later assignments.

Preventing Academic Misconduct on Websites like Course Hero

To prevent students from posting course materials to sites like Course Hero, Chegg:

  • Make your sharing policy front and center in your syllabus. Here is a suggested statement:

Do not share any course materials (lectures, lecture notes, recordings, assignments, quizzes, exams) posted to the class Canvas site. These materials are protected by U.S. copyright law and by University policy and may not be reproduced, distributed, displayed, posted or uploaded without written permission from the instructor. If you do so, you may be subject to academic misconduct proceedings under the UW Student Conduct Code.

  • Copyright every page of your course materials (print, PDFs, Canvas). Most sharing sites search for and reject content with a copyright symbol ©. See suggested statement below and this Copyright watermark example.

© Faculty Name YEAR. This content is protected. Do not upload or distribute.

Sample activities on understanding plagiarism

For additional activities, exercises, and teaching resources on using sources appropriately to avoid plagiarism, see also the Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL), sponsored by Purdue University.

Strategies for students to avoid academic misconduct

Students who plagiarize or cheat on assignments often do so because they are stressed and not budgeting enough time to learn and synthesize material and draft their own work. See below for campus resources for finding help, study centers, and tutoring.

Dean's Office Contact: